References

1. Rosenthal, G.A. and Berenbaum, M.R., Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites, Vol. I: The Chemical Participants, Academic Press, San Diego, 1991.

2. Bernays, E.A. and Chapman, R.F., Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1994.

3. Schoonhoven, L.M., Jermy, T., and Van Loon, J.J.A., Insect-Plant Biology: From Physiology to Evolution, Academic Press, London, 1998.

4. Kerner von Marilaun, A., Flowers and Their Unbidden Guests, Kegan Paul Co., London, 1878.

5. Proctor, M., Yeo, P., and Lack, A., The Natural History of Pollination, Harper Collins, London, 1996.

6. Sanson, G., et al., Measurement of leaf biomechanical properties in studies of her-bivory: Opportunities, problems and procedures, Austral. Ecology, 26, 535, 2001.

7. Nichols-Orians, C.M. and Schultz, J.C., Interactions among leaf toughness, chemistry, and harvesting by attine ants, Ecol. Entomol., 15, 311, 1990.

8. Wright, W. and Vincent, J.F.V., Herbivory and the mechanics of fracture in plants, Biol. Rev., 71, 401, 1996.

9. Gorb, S.N. and Beutel, R.G., Evolution of locomotory attachment pads of hexapods, Naturwiss., 88, 530, 2001.

10. Eisner, T. and Shepherd, J., Caterpillar feeding on a sundew plant, Science, 150, 1608, 1965.

11. Kennedy, C.E., Attachment may be a basis for specialization in oak aphids, Ecol. Entomol., 11, 291, 1986.

12. Ellis, A.G. and Midgley, J.J., A new plant-animal mutualism involving a plant with sticky leaves and a resident hemipteran insect, Oecologia, 106, 478, 1996.

13. Southwood, T.R.E., Plant surfaces and insects — An overview, in Insects and the Plant Surface, Juniper, B.E. and Southwood, T.R.E., Eds., Edward Arnold, London, 1986, p. 1.

14. Clarke, C.M. and Kitching, R.L., Swimming ants and pitcher plants: A unique ant-plant interaction from Borneo, J. Trop. Ecol, 11, 589, 1995.

15. Futuyma, D.J., Some current approaches to the evolution of plant-herbivore interactions, Plant Species Biol., 15, 1, 2000.

16. Thompson, J.N., The Coevolutionary Process, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1994.

17. Federle, W., et al., Slippery ant-plants and skillful climbers: Selection and protection of specific ant partners by epicuticular wax blooms in Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae), Oecologia, 112, 217, 1997.

18. Whitmore, T.C., Macaranga Thou., in The Euphorbiaceae of Borneo, Airy-Shaw, H.K., Ed., HMSO (Her Majesty's Stationery Office), London, 1975, p. 140.

19. Fiala, B., et al., Diversity, evolutionary specialisation and geographic distribution of a mutualistic ant-plant complex: Macaranga and Crematogaster in South East Asia, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 66, 305, 1999.

20. Federle, W., Rohrseitz, K., and Hölldobler, B., Attachment forces of ants measured with a centrifuge: better "wax-runners" have a poorer attachment to a smooth surface, J. Exp. Biol., 203, 505, 2000.

21. Quek, S.-P., et al., Codiversification in an ant-plant mutualism: stem texture and the evolution of host use in Crematogaster (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) inhabitants of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae), Evolution, 58, 554, 2004.

22. Shaw, K.L., Conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: What mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 99, 16122, 2002.

23. Sota, T. and Vogler, A.P, Incongruence of mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus, Syst. Biol., 50, 39, 2001.

24. Feldhaar, H., Fiala, B., and Gadau, J., Is ecological speciation the driving force in the radiation of the Macaranga-associated Crematogaster (Decacrema) plant-ants? Abstract 16.7, IX Congress of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB), Leeds, UK, 2003.

25. Feldhaar, H., et al., Molecular phylogeny of Crematogaster subgenus Decacrema ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and the colonization of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) trees, Mol. Phyl. Evol., 27, 441, 2003.

26. Davies, S.J., Systematics of Macaranga Sects. Pachystemon and Pruinosae (Euphorbiaceae), Harvard Pap. Bot., 6, 371, 2001.

27. Federle, W. and Rheindt, F., Macaranga ant-plants hide food from intruders: correlation of food presentation and presence of wax barriers analysed using phylogenet-ically independent contrasts, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 84, 177, 2005.

28. Fiala, B. et al., Studies of a South East Asian ant-plant association: protection of Macaranga trees by Crematogaster borneensis, Oecologia, 79, 463, 1989.

29. Federle, W., Maschwitz, U., and Hölldobler, B., Pruning of host plant neighbors as defence against enemy ant invasions: Crematogaster ant partners of Macaranga protected by "wax barriers" prune less than their congeners, Oecologia, 132, 264, 2002.

30. Heil, M. et al., On benefits of indirect defence: Short- and long-term studies of antiherbivore protection via mutualistic ants, Oecologia, 126, 395, 2001.

Janzen, D.H., Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America, Evolution, 20, 249, 1966.

Heil, M., et al., Reduced chemical defence in ant-plants? A critical re-evaluation of a widely accepted hypothesis, Oikos, 99, 457, 2002.

Eck, G. et al., Trade-off between chemical and biotic antiherbivore defense in the South East Asian plant genus Macaranga, J. Chem. Ecol, 27, 1979, 2001. Davidson, D.W., Longino, J.T., and Snelling, R.R., Pruning of host plant neighbors by ants: An experimental approach, Ecology, 69, 801, 1988.

Itioka, T. et al., Difference in intensity of ant defense among three species of Macaranga myrmecophytes in a Southeast Asian dipterocarp forest, Biotrop., 32, 318, 2000. Feldhaar, H. et al., Patterns of the Crematogaster-Macaranga association: The ant partner makes the difference, Insectes Soc., 50, 9, 2003.

Felsenstein, J., Phylogenies and the comparative method, Am. Nat., 125, 1, 1985. Federle, W. et al., Incident daylight as orientation cue for hole-boring ants: Prostomata in Macaranga ant-plants, Insectes Soc., 48, 165, 2001.

Brouat, C. et al., Plant lock and ant key: Pairwise coevolution of an exclusion filter in an ant-plant mutualism, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268, 2131, 2001. Davidson, D.W., Snelling, R.R., and Longino, J.T., Competition among ants for myrmecophytes and the significance of plant trichomes, Biotropica, 21, 64, 1989. Gorb, S., Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, 2001.

Dai, Z., Gorb, S.N., and Schwarz, U., Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae), J. Exp. Biol., 205, 2479, 2002.

Federle, W. et al., An integrative study of insect adhesion: Mechanics and wet adhesion of pretarsal pads in ants, Integ. Comp. Biol., 42, 1100, 2002.

Vötsch, W. et al., Chemical composition of the attachment pad secretion of the locust

Locusta migratoria, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 32, 1605, 2002.

Markstädter, C. et al., Chemical composition of the slippery epicuticular wax blooms on Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) ant-plants, Chemoecology, 10, 33, 2000.

Kerner von Marilaun, A., Pflanzenleben, Band 2, Bibliographisches Institut, Leipzig,

1891.

Knoll, F., Über die Ursache des Ausgleitens der Insektenbeine an wachsbedeckten Pflanzenteilen, Jahrb. wiss. Bot., 54, 448, 1914.

Stork, N.E., Role of wax blooms in preventing attachment to brassicas by the mustard beetle, Phaedon cochleariae, Entom. Exp. Appl., 28, 100, 1980. Gaume, L. et al., How do plant waxes cause flies to slide? Experimental tests of wax-based trapping mechanisms in three pitfall carnivorous plants, Arthropod Struct. Dev., 33, 103, 2004.

Gorb, E.V. and Gorb, S.N., Attachment ability of the beetle Chrysolina fastuosa on various plant surfaces, Entom. Exp. Appl., 105, 13, 2002.

Eigenbrode, S.D. and Jetter, R., Attachment to plant surface waxes by an insect predator, Integ. Comp. Biol., 42, 1091, 2002.

Eigenbrode, S.D. and Kabalo, N.N., Effects of Brassica oleracea waxblooms on predation and attachment by Hippodamia convergens, Entomol Exp. Applic., 91 (April), 125, 1999.

Juniper, B.E. and Burras, J.K., How pitcher plants trap insects, New Scientist, 13, 75, 1962.

54. Eigenbrode, S.D. et al., Mobility of three generalist predators is greater on cabbage with glossy leaf wax than on cabbage with a wax bloom, Entom. Exp. Appl., 81, 335, 1996.

55. Stork, N.E., The form of plant waxes: A means of preventing insect attachment? in Insects and the Plant Surface, Juniper, B.E. and Southwood, T.R.E., Eds., Edward Arnold, London, 1986, p. 346.

56. Federle, W., Baumgartner, W., and Hölldobler, B., Biomechanics of ant adhesive pads: Frictional forces are rate- and temperature-dependent, J. Exp. Biol., 207, 67, 2004.

57. Cartmill, M., Climbing, in: Functional Vertebrate Morphology, Hildebrand, M. et al., Eds., The Belknap Press, Cambridge, 1985, p. 73.

58. Ahman, I., Plant-surface characteristics and movements of two Brassica-feeding aphids, Lipaphis erysimi and Brevicoryne brassicae, Symp. Biol. Hung., 39, 119, 1990.

59. Eigenbrode, S.D., Plant surface waxes and insect behaviour, in Plant Cuticles — An Integrated Functional Approach, Kerstiens, G., Ed., Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, 1996, p. 201.

0 0

Post a comment