Setting Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation

Throughout most of the world, the practical and economic resources for conserving biodiversity are extremely limited. Therefore we need to set priorities for conservation action. To do this, we must decide what aspect of biodiversity we want to conserve, and we must use the appropriate surrogate to measure the biodiversity in the areas under comparison. For example, if we are working on freshwater fishes, we know that the Amazon Basin probably contains the most numerous and diverse fish fauna on earth, exceeding 1,000 species (Lundberg et al., 2000). However, we may be particularly interested in conserving endemic species that live in unusual habitats. In that case, we might be more inclined to put a premium on regions of Australia and New Guinea that are not rich in species (with about 500 species recorded) but do contain some unusual endemics found only in very restricted habitats, such as warm desert springs or ephemeral pools. As noted above, if we are particularly interested in conserving phylogenetically basal members of certain groups of fishes, such as cichlids and mullets, then we would direct our conservation efforts toward the rivers of Madagascar.

In some cases, the prioritization of regions for conservation is based, more pragmatically, on the relative threat of extinction to the species present. Thus, if we have $50,000 for conserving freshwater fish in either Brazil or Australia, our first inclination might be to use the money in the Brazilian Amazon, because there are more species there. But if we examine the 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (http://www.redlist.org), we can see that Australia has eight species of freshwater fish that are listed as "critically endangered," while Brazil has none. The biodiversity of Australia's freshwater fish is not as great as that of Brazil, but it is of special importance because proportionally more of the species are threatened. Thus there is an imperative to focus on the Australian freshwater fish for conservation work.

However, the example above represents an oversimplification. When any two regions are compared for prioritization of conservation action, conservation biologists look at all the other species present in the two regions, and they usually categorize areas based on the diversity or uniqueness of the entire ecosystem, rather than an individual species. Additionally, the quality of biodiversity data is highly variable for different continents. Some regions, such as parts of the Brazilian Amazon, may be imperiled by severe habitat loss, but there is inadequate data available to show that. The biodiversity of these regions may appear stable and unthreatened (with no species included on the IUCN Red List) simply because they have been undersampled and inadequately studied. Conservation biologists then choose to collect baseline information about the biodiversity of areas that are potentially important sites for conservation (Samways et al., 1995).

The choice of what surrogate to measure is never neutral. What you measure and how you measure it places a higher value on some particular element of biodiversity. By choosing one level, or unit, you draw attention and resources away from another. Ultimately, conservation decisions are influenced by many factors— political, economic, scientific, and social. Clear definitions of what level and aspects of biodiversity to target can help strengthen the effectiveness of science in the decision-making process.

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0127506. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

—Ian J. Harrison, Melina F. Laverty, and Eleanor J. Sterling

Bibliography

Angermeier, P. L. 2000. "The Natural Imperative for Biological Conservation." Conservation Biology 14, no. 2: 373-381; Anonymous. 2001. "Archaean Microbes Show We're Older than We Think." Aus-GEO News 62 (August/September): 7-8; Biodiversity Project. 2002. "Americans and Biodiversity: New Poll Shows Growing Awareness, Strong Support for Biodiversity." Biodiversity Notes 8, no. 1: 1-4, http://www.biodiverse.org; Bisby, F. A., and J. Coddington. 1995. "Biodiversity from a Taxonomic and Evolutionary Perspective." In Global Biodiversity Assessment, edited by V. H. Heywood and R. T. Watson, pp. 27-56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Blackburn, T. M., and K. J. Gaston. 1996. "A Sideways Look at Patterns in Species Richness, or Why There Are So Few Species Outside the Tropics." Biodiversity Letters 3: 44-53; Butler, D. R. 1995. Zoogeomorphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Center for Biodiversity and Conservation. 1999. Humans and Other Catastrophes: Perspectives on Extinction. New York: Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History; Cracraft, C. 1983. "Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis." Ornithology 1: 159-187; Du Rietz, G. E. 1930. "The Fundamental Units of Biological Tax onomy." Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 24: 333-428; Eldredge, N. 1998. Life in the Balance: Humanity and the Biodiversity Crisis. Princeton: Princeton University Press; Fredrickson, J. K., and T. C. Onstott. 1996. "Microbes Deep inside the Earth." Scientific American 275 (4):68-73; Gaston, K. J. 1996. "What Is Biodiversity?" In Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference, edited by K. J. Gaston, pp. 1-9. Oxford: Blackwell Science; Gaston, K. J., and J. I. Spicer. 1998. "Mapping Biodiversity." In Biodiversity: An Introduction, edited by Gaston and Spicer, pp. 43-75. Oxford: Blackwell Science; Gery, J. 1969. "The Freshwater Fishes of South America." In Biogeography and Ecology in South America, edited by E. J. Fittkau et al., pp. 828-848. The Hague: W. Junk; Gross, L. J., B. C. Mullin, S. E. Riechert, O. J. Schwarz, M. Beals, and S. Harrell, eds. "Alternative Routes to Quantitative Literacy for the Life Sciences," a project supported by the National Science Foundation through award DUE-9752339 to the University of Tennessee, Knoxville August 1, 1998-July 31, 2000. The Institute for Environmental Modelling, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. http://www.tiem.utk.edu (cited June 21, 2002); Haeckel, E. 1869. "Ueber Entwichelunge Gang 4." Aufgabe de Zoologie Jemais-che 5: 353-370; Hammond, P. 1995. "The Current Magnitude of Biodiversity." In Global Biodiversity Assessment, edited by V. H. Heywood and R. T. Watson, pp. 113-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Harrison, I. J. 1996. "Interface Areas in Small Fish." Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 69: 15-45; Harrison, I. J., and M. L. J. Stiassny. 1999. "The Quiet Crisis: A Preliminary Listing of the Freshwater Fishes of the World That Are Extinct or "Missing in Action." In Extinctions in Near Time: Causes, Contexts, and Consequences, edited by R. D. E. MacPhee, pp. 271-331. New York: Kluwer/Plenum; Hunter, M., Jr. 1996. "Benchmarks for Managing Ecosystems: Are Human Activities Natural?" Conservation Biology 10, no. 3: 695-697; Hunter, Malcolm L., Jr. 2002. Fundamentals of Conservation Biology. 2d ed. Abingdon, England: Blackwell Science; Williston, VT: Distributed by Blackwell Pub.; Jablonski, D. 1995. "Extinctions in the Fossil Record." In Extinction Rates, edited by J. H. Lawton and R. M. May, pp. 25-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Kottelat, M. 1995. "Systematic Studies and Biodiversity: The Need for a Pragmatic Approach." Journal of Natural History 29: 565-569; Kottelat, M. 1997. "European Freshwater Fishes: An Heuristic Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Europe (Exclusive of Former USSR), with an Introduction for Nonsystematists and Comments on Nomenclature and Conservation." Biologia (Bratislava) 52 (Suppl.

5): 1-271; Lecointre, G., and H. Le Guyader. 2001. Classification phylogenetique du vivant. Paris: Belin; Lotka, A. J. 1925. Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; Lundberg, J. G, et al. 2000. "So Many Fishes, So Little Time: An Overview of Recent Ichthyological Discovery in Continental Waters." Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87, no. 1: 26-62; Lundberg, J. G., et al. 1998. "The Stage for Neotropical Fish Diversification: A History of Tropical South American Rivers." In Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes, edited by L. R. Malabara et al., pp. 13-48. Porto Alegre, Brazil: EDIPUCRS; MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press; Magurran, Anne E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press; Malthus, T. R. 1798. An Essay on Principles of Population. London: Johnson; Mayden, R. L. 1997. "A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem." In Species: The Units of Biodiversity, edited by M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson. pp. 381-424. London: Chapman and Hall; Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; McCann, K. S. 2000. "The Diversity-stability Debate." Nature 405: 228-233; McLennan, D. A. 1993. "Phylogenetic Relationships in the Gas-terosteidae: An Updated Tree Based on Behavioral Characters with a Discussion of Homoplasy." Copeia 1993, no. 2: 318-326; Meffe, G. K., and R. Carroll. 1997. "What Is Conservation Biology?" In Principles of Conservation Biology, 2d ed., edited by G. K. Meffe and R. C. Carroll, pp. 3-27. Sunderland, MA: Sin-auer; Miller, B., G. Ceballos, and R. Reading. 1994. "The Prairie Dog and Biotic Diversity." Conservation Biology 8, no. 3: 677-681; Mojzsis, S. J. 2001. "Life and the Evolution of Earth's Atmosphere." In Earth Inside and Out, edited by E. A. Mathez, pp. 32-39. New York: American Museum of Natural History; Mojz-sis, S. J., et al. 1996. "Evidence for Life on Earth before 3,800 Million Years Ago." Nature 384: 55-59; Myers, N. 1996. "Two Key Challenges for Biodiversity: Discontinuities and Synergisms." Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 1025-1034; Noss, R. F. 1990. "Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach." Conservation Biology 4, no. 4: 355-364; Pennisi, E. 2001. "Genome Duplications: The Stuff of Evolution?" Science 294: 2458-2460; Pfisterer, A. B., and B. Schmid, 2002. "Diversity-dependent Production Can Decrease the Stability of Ecosystem Functioning." Nature 416 (6876): 84-86; Pimm, S. L., et al. 1995. "The Future of Biodiversity."

Science 269: 347-350; Raup, D. M. 1991. Extinction: Bad Genes or Bad Luck? New York: W. W. Norton; Redford, K. H., and B. D. Richter. 1999. "Conservation of Biodiversity in a World of Use." Conservation Biology 13, no. 6: 1246-1256; Regan, H. M., et al. 2001. "The Currency and Tempo of Extinction." American Naturalist 157: 1-10; Samways, M. J., et al. 1995. "Inventorying and Monitoring: Characterization of Biodiversity." In Global Biodiversity Assessment, edited by V. H. Heywood and R. T. Watson, pp. 475-514. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Sechrest, W., et al. 2002. "Hotspots and the Conservation of Evolutionary History." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, no. 4: 2067-2071; Seehausen, O. 2002. "Patterns in Fish Radiation Are Compatible with Pleistocene Desiccation of Lake Victoria and 14,600 Year History for Its Cichlid Species Flock." Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (Biological Sciences) 269(1490): 491-497; Smith, R. L. 1990. Ecology and Field Biology, 4th ed. New York: Harper Collins; Stein, B. A., L. S. Kutner, and J. S. Adams. 2000. Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Stiassny, M. L. J. 1997. "Systematics and Conservation." In Principles of Conservation Biology, 2d ed., edited by G. K. Meffe, and R. C. Carroll, pp. 70-72. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; Stork, N. E. 1997. "Measuring Global Biodiversity and Its Decline." In Biodiversity II: Understanding and Protecting Our Biological Resources: A Biology of Numbers and Difference, edited by M. L. Reaka-Kudla, D. E. Wilson, and E. O. Wilson, pp. 41-68. Oxford: Blackwell Science; Thacker, P. 2001. "A New Wind Sweeps the Plains." Science 292: 2427; Urban, D. L., R. V. O'Neill, and H. H. Shugart.

1987. "Landscape Ecology." BioScience 37: 119-127; Veron, J. 2000. Corals of the World. Townsville, Qld: Australian Institute of Marine Science; Vitousek, P. M., et al. 1997. "Human Domination of Earth's Ecosystems." Science 277: 494-499; Volterra, V. 1926. "Variation and Fluctuations of the Numbers of Individuals in Animal Species Living Together." In Animal Ecology, edited by R. M. Chapman, pp. 409-448. New York: McGraw-Hill; Wals, A. E. J., and D. Van Weelie. 1998. "Diversity in Biodiversity: Environmental Education and the Learning of Ill-defined Concepts." In Weaving Connections: Cultures and Environments: Environmental Education and the Peoples of the World, pp. 328-333. Troy, OH: NAAEE; Wenzel, J. W. 1992. "Behavioral Homology and Phylogeny." Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 361-381; Whittaker, R. H. 1972. "Evolution and Measurement of Species Diversity." Taxon 21: 213-251; Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: John Wiley and Sons; Williams, P. H., and C. J. Humphries. 1996. "Comparing Character Diversity among Biotas." In Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference, edited by K. J. Gaston, pp. 54-76. Oxford: Blackwell Science; Wilson, E. O., and F. M. Peters, eds. 1988. Biodiversity. Washington DC: National Academy Press; World Conservation Monitoring Center. 1992. Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources. London: Chapman and Hall; Yu, J., et al. 2002. "A Draft Sequence of the Rice Genome (Oryzasativa L. ssp. indica)." Science 296: 79-92; WWF. 1999. "WWF's Global Conservation Programme 1999/2000." http://panda.org (accessed June 19, 2002).

Worm Farming

Worm Farming

Do You Want To Learn More About Green Living That Can Save You Money? Discover How To Create A Worm Farm From Scratch! Recycling has caught on with a more people as the years go by. Well, now theres another way to recycle that may seem unconventional at first, but it can save you money down the road.

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment