Both environment and species change in the course of time, and thus ecological niches are not stable and given forever. Species not only respond to environmental changes, but also actively change their biotic and abiotic environment, affecting both their own niche and the niches of other organisms. The importance of competition, predation, or mutualism has been already stressed. Moreover, organisms often make niche space for other organisms available in the environment - think of successive colonization of an island where first colonizers modify environment for their successors, internal (endobiotic) organisms, or emerging trees. Some organisms strongly directly affect abiotic environment, determining possible niches for a whole community of species - beavers building dams, earthworms altering soil structure, or, on a larger scale, plants providing oxygen are classical examples. Organisms substantially affecting abiotic environment are often called 'ecosystem engineers' and the process in which an organism systematically modifies its own niche (both biotic and abiotic components), is called
'niche construction'. Obviously, this process is most pronounced in Homo sapiens, which is currently the most conspicuous ecosystem engineer.
If a species can change its environment as well as adapt to it, a coevolution between a species and its niche can follow, based on the continuous feedback between a species' 'niche construction' and its adaptation. Since species continuously change the environment for themselves as well as for other species, species' niches could be very dynamic. Often, however, species' ecological requirements are quite stable over evolutionary time, so that it is even possible to reliably reconstruct an ancient environment on the basis of presence of particular species in the fossil record and the knowledge of their contemporary ecological niches. This can be attributed to the fact that it is often easier to search for appropriate habitat elsewhere if an environment within a locality is changing than to adapt to it. All species have some dispersal abilities, and are thus able to track spatio-temporally changing habitat availability by migration rather than adapt to different conditions by mutation-selection process. The other reason for the apparent niche conservatism is the existence of evolutionary constraints and consequent tradeoffs: species often cannot easily change their traits in a particular direction if these traits are associated with other traits whose change is not advantageous.
As species undertake evolutionary changes, their functional niches can change, leading to changes in the overall 'ecological space' in an ecosystem, and promoting further changes in species traits. On the other hand, some functional niches, that is, particular ecological roles, could be rather stable even if species evolve, go extinct, and new species emerge - a similar functional role can be progressively fulfilled by different species. Community evolution can be therefore viewed as a coevolution of ecological niches rather than of species themselves.
See also: Allee Effects; Biotopes; Community; Competition and Coexistence in Model Populations; Gause's Competitive Exclusion Principle; Habitat.
Was this article helpful?
You Might Start Missing Your Termites After Kickin'em Out. After All, They Have Been Your Roommates For Quite A While. Enraged With How The Termites Have Eaten Up Your Antique Furniture? Can't Wait To Have Them Exterminated Completely From The Face Of The Earth? Fret Not. We Will Tell You How To Get Rid Of Them From Your House At Least. If Not From The Face The Earth.