Where should we focus conservation effort

Several categories of risk of species extinction have been defined (Mace & Lande, 1991). A species can be described as vulnerable if there is considered to be a 10% probability of extinction within 100 years, endangered if the probability is 20% within 20 years or 10 generations, whichever is longer, and critically endangered if within 5 years or two generations the risk of extinction is at least 50% (Figure 7.17). Based on these criteria, how many species on earth?

modern and historic extinction rates compared a human-induced mass extinction?

classification of the threat to species

Figure 7.16 Trends in recorded animal species extinctions since 1600, for which a date is known, in: (a) the major oceans and their islands, (b) major continental areas, for (c) invertebrates and (d) vertebrates. (After Smith et al., 1993.)

Species Richness

Figure 7.16 Trends in recorded animal species extinctions since 1600, for which a date is known, in: (a) the major oceans and their islands, (b) major continental areas, for (c) invertebrates and (d) vertebrates. (After Smith et al., 1993.)

43% of vertebrate species have been classified as threatened (i.e. they fell into one of the above categories) (Mace, 1994).

On the basis of these definitions, both governments and nongovernmental organizations have produced threatened species lists (the basis of analyses like that shown in Table 7.4). Clearly, these lists provide a starting point for setting priorities for developing plans to manage individual species. However, resources for conservation are limited and spending the most money on species with the highest extinction probabilities will be a false economy if a particular highly ranked species would require a huge recovery effort but with little chance of success (Possingham et al., 2002). As in all areas of applied ecology, conservation priorities have both ecological and economic dimensions. In desperate times, painful decisions have to be made about priorities. Wounded soldiers arriving at field hospitals in the First World War were subjected to a triage evaluation: priority 1 - those who were likely to survive but only with rapid intervention; priority 2 - those who were likely to survive without rapid intervention; priority 3 - those who were likely to die with or without intervention. Conservation managers are often faced with the same kind of choices and need to demonstrate some courage in giving up on hopeless cases, and prioritizing those species where something can be done.

Species that are at high risk of extinction are almost always rare. Nevertheless, rare species, just by virtue of their rarity, are not necessarily at risk of extinction. It is clear that many, probably most, species are naturally rare. The population dynamics of such species may follow a characteristic pattern. For example, out of a group of four species of Calochortus lilies in California, one is abundant and three many species are naturally rare

Table 7.4 The current numbers and percentages of named animal and plant species in major taxa judged to be threatened with extinction. The higher values associated with plants, birds and mammals may reflect our greater knowledge of these taxa. (After Smith et al., 1993.)

Taxons

Animals

Molluscs

Crustaceans

Insects

Fishes

Amphibians

Reptiles

Birds

Mammals

Total

Number of threatened species

354 126 873 452 59 167 1,029 505 3,565

Approximate total species

Percentage threatened

Plants

Gymnosperms

Monocotyledons

Monocotyledons: palms

Dicotyledons

Total

242 4,421 925 17,474 22,137

32 9

Figure 7.17 Levels of threat as a function of time and probability of extinction. (After Ak^akaya, 1992.)

However, while some species are born rare, others have rarity thrust upon them. The actions of humans have undoubtedly reduced the abundance and range of many species (including naturally rare species). A review of the factors responsible for recorded vertebrate extinctions shows that habitat loss, overexploitation and invasions of exotic species are all of considerable significance, although habitat loss was less prominent in the case of reptiles and overexploitation less important in the case of fishes (Table 7.5). As far as threatened extinctions are concerned, habitat loss is most commonly the major hazard, whilst risk of overexploitation remains very high, especially for mammals and reptiles. The probability of extinction may be enhanced in small populations for two different reasons related to genetics (Section 7.5.3) and population dynamics (Section 7.5.4). We deal with them in turn.

1

/

I

/

Safe /

/

/

Vulnerable

/

- f ,

'' Endangered j

/ /

/

J

/ .

1

/

-a

1 1 1

i i

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Probability of extinction

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Probability of extinction other species have rarity thrust upon them are rare (Fiedler, 1987). The rare species have larger bulbs but produce fewer fruits per plant and have a smaller probability of survival to reproductive age than the common species. The rare species can all be categorized as climax species that are restricted to unusual soil types, whilst the common one is a colonizer of disturbed habitats. Rare taxa may generally have a tendency towards asexual reproduction, lower overall reproductive effort and poorer dispersal abilities (Kunin & Gaston, 1993). In the absence of human interference there is no reason to expect that the rarer types would be substantially more at risk of extinction.

Lawn Care

Lawn Care

The Secret of A Great Lawn Without Needing a Professional You Can Do It And I Can Show You How! A Great Looking Lawn Doesnt Have To Cost Hundreds Of Dollars Or Require The Use Of A Professional Lawn Care Service. All You Need Is This Incredible Book!

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment